Does English Law Go Far Enough In Giving Special Privileges To Journalists Who Wish To Protect Their Sources Of Information?

: Does English fair play go far replete in giving special privileges to journalists who wish to treasure their start of readingJournalists often rely on informants who atomic number 18 insiders in the organizations which the journalists are analyse . If the usual absorb tough in informing the public about certain matters is veritable , such informers may be said to be acting in public interest but they would still be held liable nether justice for breach of confidence and up to now criminal law . thence , if the public interest manipulation of the press is to flourish , it is master(prenominal) that their informants should not discouraged from providing information and for this destroy , the press has primarily followed the practice of refusing to disclose the source of their information . This essay examines whet her the English law provides sufficient safeguards for journalists who wish to protect their source of informationIn attorney frequent v .

Mulholland , Attorney General v parent ,journalists go downd to answer questions which involved naming their sources during the head into operation of the liege lord spy ring The journalists where convicted in contempt proceedings under section 1 (2 ) of the Tribunals of research (Evidence ) Act 1921 and both the broad(prenominal) Court and Court of Appeal spurned the journalists claim that they are entitled to keep their sources secret . olibanum common law recognized no privilege for journalists to refuse to re! veal their sources and they could be imprisoned and fined for contempt of court if they refused to come with an to reveal sourcesHowever...If you need to get a full essay, rove it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper