Political Science India & Nigeria

India and NigeriaBoth India and Nigeria were colonized by the British , and are characterized by extremedivisions indoors the res publica . Yet , India has been more successful than Nigeria indemocratization , because of a multicoloured of primingsOne of the main reasons for success of democracy in India , is its constitution . every(prenominal) business organisation isbeing taken to ensure that no world bureau is despotical . All authorities are soluble to some dresser . Power is shared between the Prime Minister , who is the Legislative head of thecountry and the professorship , who is the constitutional head of the country . Both are answerable toeach other . Except the President , there is no authority which has a secured time frame . Thisensures that any pillowcase of autarchy is never born , and if at all it is born , it is neer nurtured . IndiraGandhi tried to become autocratic , and she was thrown out of power by the bulk . The choicecommission in India is an autonomous body , and so free and fair elections are a reality inIndia . This is non admittedly of Nigeria . Her constitution has no checks for growth of any type ofautocracyAnother reason is that license in India was a result of massive wakening of thepeople , led by draws like Mahatma Gandhi , who never precious any power Selfless service wasvery much(prenominal) in movement in India .

This was completely absent in Nigeria There were no semi governmen tal leadership to induce the spirit of self ! trust in the people of NigeriaIndia had only one very powerful national political party , the Indian National sexual relation , for more decades since its Independence . This fact , coupled with a very bulletproof leader like Nehruensured a stable governance to the country . Nehru was re-re elected the Prime Minister of Indiafor almost 14 old get along with . Stability of government ensured a very firm descent word for democracy toflourish in India . This was not the case with Nigeria . It had many political parties (History ofNigeria ) which were eager for development of their own groups only Selfishness prevailedamongst the leaders , and they were not ready to take accept defeats (Kurlantizick JoshuaThis gave a gross(a) pouffe to the democratic dreams of its massesReferences1 . History of Nigeria , wikipedia the free encyclopedia , 21 July 07Retrieved on 27 July 07 fromp 2 . Kurlantizick Joshua , Nigeria s disastrous presidential election Failed state5 February 07 , Ret rieved on 27 July 07 fromp PAGEPAGE 3...If you want to get a well(p) essay, redact it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper