Comparison Of Apollo From The Portonaccio Temple And Aule Metele :: essays research papers

Comparison of Apollo from the Portonaccio Temple and Aule MeteleThough the figures are not remote from each other is height comparison, they seem to contain a limpid amount of difference in other aspects. First of all, they were made from contrasting materials. While the Apollo statue is terracotta, the Aule Metele is of bronze. Generally speaking, the Apollo statue appears in a very symbolical way of life in that his features are not well defined in feature while the Aule Metele shows a type of inspiring complexity with detail. The Apollo statue consists of a fit that is shown in a pattern like manner. The robe does not display realism but symbolism due to its lack of variation in the folds. The Aule Metele however, shows a vast deal of realism in the drooping folds and malformed shoulder strap. It looks as though the material is in fact freely moving and could be manipulated. The muscle structure of the Apollo statue also displays a great deal of generalization. The limbs are robust and irregularly plump in areas as can be seen in the calf area of the right leg. The Aule Metele displays a great deal of understanding of muscle as well as uprise structure in the limbs as can be seen in the edges created in the extended right arm of the figure. In terms of lead and neck features, the figures seem to be most distant. While the Apollo statue has a fully grown smile on his face, the Metele has an expression of stern seriousness. The Apollo statue has no more facial nerve detail than cheekbones roughly instilled. The Metele shows complete understanding of the human muscle and bone structure in the face.